The wildfires in Los Angeles, including the Palisades, Eaton, Hurst, and Runyon Canyon fires, are fast-moving, destructive, and scary. As of the evening of January 8, 2025, they have caused extensive damage and led to the evacuation of more than 100,000 residents. The Palisades Fire has burned 18 square miles, the Eaton Fire 16.5 square
When a loss event badly damages a key piece of equipment or machinery, an insured business often faces the complicated question: repair or replace? This is especially so when the extent of the damage is unclear because some may still be hidden.
A business presented with this dilemma is well advised to go through that decision-making process assuming that it is spending its own money.
In all likelihood, however, the business will have insurance for the loss event, and most commercial property policies are written on a “replacement cost” basis. Yet, those policies often define “replacement cost” as being the lesser of “the cost to repair, rebuild or replace” the damaged property with property of comparable size, material and quality. They commonly include coverage for the loss of business income sustained by the insured due to the suspension of the insured’s business during the “period of restoration,” and tie the length of that period to the date when the damaged property should be “repaired, rebuilt or replaced” with reasonable diligence.
These standard commercial property provisions contain a trap for the unwary. Hidden within them lurks the opportunity for the insurance company to second guess the decisions that its insured is now forced to make under abnormal conditions and while facing financial distress.Continue Reading Too damaged to repair? How to maximize your insurance recovery
With the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic in 2020, businesses across the country were forced to shut their doors and turn to their commercial property insurance companies to seek coverage. With their properties having been rendered useless for their intended (and insured) business purposes, these insureds reasonably expected their “all risk” policies would provide the promised “business income” protection due to the “physical loss” of their properties. The insurance industry, however, near-universally denied coverage, leading to a proliferation of lawsuits around the country – including in Pennsylvania.
On November 30, 2022 the Pennsylvania Superior Court issued a pair of decisions that ostensibly addressed the same legal question posed in the vast majority of these cases – whether the term “physical loss” in a commercial property policy can reasonably be construed to mean the loss of use of property for its intended business purpose. Curiously, the Superior Court’s decisions in Ungarean v. CNA & Valley Forge Insurance Co., Nos. 490 WDA 2021, No. 948 WDA 2021, 2022 Pa. Super. LEXIS 467 (Pa. Super. Ct. Nov. 30, 2022) and MacMiles, LLC v. Erie Insurance Exchange, No. 1100 WDA 2021, 2022 Pa. Super. LEXIS 469 (Pa. Super. Ct. Nov. 30, 2022) reached opposite and seemingly contradictory conclusions, leaving the question far from settled within Pennsylvania.Continue Reading A tale of two opinions: The meaning of “physical loss” in the context of commercial property policies for Covid-19-related losses in Pennsylvania
The United Kingdom Supreme Court (UKSC) handed down its judgment on 15 January 2021 in The Financial Conduct Authority v. Arch Insurance (UK) Limited and Others. This test case was brought by the FCA on behalf of SME business interruption (BI) policyholders who have suffered financial losses as a result of COVID-19. The High Court judgment was handed down on 15 September 2020, with the special direct appeal to the UKSC taking place on 16 – 19 November 2020. The UKSC decision was largely seen as a victory for policyholders. As commented by Reed Smith partner, Mark Pring, in the Financial Times, “it can be said, without fear of hyperbole, that in principle at least this really is a catastrophic outcome for insurers.”
We have been reporting on these matters closely since March of last year, and have produced several more detailed alerts, which can be found on our Perspectives platform.
The court was asked to consider three broad categories of BI policy wordings, namely:
In this post, we summarise some of the key points of the UKSC’s most recent decision and set out our views on some of the implications of the decision for policyholders (subject always to their individual circumstances).Continue Reading FCA v. Arch and others – The UK Supreme Court’s final word on business interruption insurance losses in light of the COVID-19 pandemic
A concert promoter cancels a sold-out show of a world-renowned recording artist, reimbursing millions of dollars in ticket sales as a result. If the reason for the cancellation was COVID-19, does insurance cover that?
Event Cancellation Insurance Basics
Event cancellation insurance generally provides coverage only when there has been a triggering event under the policy. Some policies are written, for example, to only cover cancellations caused by rain or bad weather. Other event cancellation policies are all-risk policies, meaning that coverage may be triggered by any cause that is not specifically excluded. For all types of event cancellation insurance, the triggering event must have been fortuitous, or outside of the policyholder’s control.
Good News for Policyholders
The good news for policyholders is that many all-risk event cancellation policies do cover cancellations caused by COVID-19 related shut-down orders. For such policies, a shut-down order should qualify as a fortuitous triggering event. Across the United States, nearly every jurisdiction has enacted some kind of order that caused the cancellation of large-scale events.
Notes of Caution
Policyholders should be cautious concerning the scope of exclusions in respect of viruses and communicable diseases. Although these types of exclusions may bar coverage related to COVID-19, it is important to be mindful of variations in the exclusion language used. Some exclusions apply to only specific named viruses, such as SARS and MERS. Other exclusions contain carve-outs that may be applicable to COVID-19.Continue Reading COVID-19 event cancellation insurance – good news and bad news
Reed Smith Insurance Recovery partners John Shugrue, John Ellison, Amber Finch, Richard Lewis, and Matthew Weaver offer discussion and analysis on key issues relevant to businesses seeking, or evaluating whether to seek, coverage for COVID-19 losses. This webinar is available on demand and you can register here.
Here’s a brief summary of the topics addressed in the webinar:
Business interruption insurance provides coverage when physical loss or damage adversely impacts a business, causing it loss. This insurance covers lost profit and continuing expenses for the period needed to repair or replace damaged property and is designed to do for the business “what the business would have done had there been no loss or damage to property.” For COVID-19, the key issue for business interruption coverage is: Can the known or suspected presence of a virus cause “physical loss or damage” to property? For most businesses, it should generally be possible to make the requisite showing of physical loss or damage.
In commentary, insurance companies have raised a variety of exclusions as potentially barring coverage for COVID-19 related losses. Some of the exclusions raised include exclusions for virus, bacteria, contaminants, mold, and pollution. Although there is significant diversity in exclusion wording across property policies, many policies contain standard virus exclusion language promulgated by the Insurance Services Office (ISO). The ISO made demonstrably false statements to state regulators in seeking approval for this language. Accordingly, virus exclusions may be vulnerable to challenge. Additional information about insurers’ misrepresentations concerning virus exclusions is discussed in this article. Additionally, there are available challenges to the other forms of exclusion that insurers are raising that present viable responses to obtaining coverage even when they are asserted by your insurance company.
Directors and officers liability insurance (D&O) coverage typically applies to liability claims made against individual directors for breach of fiduciary duty and to claims made against the business for securities law violations. Potential claims implicating D&O coverage related to COVID-19 include shareholder claims for alleged failures to plan for, or respond to, the pandemic.Continue Reading Join us for an on-demand webinar “What policyholders really need to know about insurance for COVID-19”
Purchasing insurance for a cannabusiness can feel like a daunting task, but it does not have to be one.
In addition to grappling with many of the same issues and questions that any business confronts when seeking insurance, a cannabusiness encounters certain additional, unique challenges due to the industry in which it operates. That is no reason to panic, however. And, it is certainly no reason to avoid purchasing insurance.
There are a number of steps that a cannabusiness – or, really, any business – can take to maximize the likelihood that the insurance-procurement process will be smooth and successful. In particular, when purchasing insurance, a cannabusiness should consider the following 10 steps: Continue Reading Ten important steps a cannabusiness should consider when purchasing insurance
We recently marked the two year anniversary of Superstorm Sandy. With that anniversary came an influx of litigation in response to insurance companies denying or overly limiting coverage. That litigation recently revealed highly questionable practices within the industry.
Continue Reading Potentially Fraudulent Insurance Company Practices Are Exposed In Superstorm Sandy Litigation
The Buffalo, New York area has been devastated with record level snowfalls causing widespread damage. Now that the snow has stopped falling, warmer weather and potentially heavy rainfall may cause flooding and will likely exacerbate the losses being experienced. This will complicate insurance claims because policyholders will inevitably face pushback from insurance companies regarding the extent of damage from the snowstorms versus subsequent flooding.
Continue Reading The End of the Snow Is Still Not the End of the Problems For the Buffalo, NY Area
Can policyholders expect coverage for loss of Business Income if (1) they must close their business and decontaminate it after the property is exposed to persons with the Ebola virus or (2) civil authorities prohibit access to their property because of such exposure?
Continue Reading Property Exposed to the Ebola Virus – Are Associated Business Income Losses Covered Under First Party Policies?